Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: missing values


From   Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: missing values
Date   Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:54:48 +0200

the missing details for the paper are: industrial and labor relations,
volume 49, issue 2.
The difference between the log wages of men and women does not equal
the sum of the wage gap in each occupation. May this be due to missing
values in the ingredients used in the decomposition?
Thanks a lot


On 02/04/2012, Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Chiara Mussida  wrote:
>> i want to calculate the decomposition(eq 3) in the paper of Kidd and
>> Shannon, 1996,does the level of occupational aggregation affect the
>> estimates of the gender wage gap?
>
> You have been on the list long enough, so you really should know
> better. As penance read the Statalist FAQ three times!
>
> -- Maarten
>
> --------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> Institut fuer Soziologie
> Universitaet Tuebingen
> Wilhelmstrasse 36
> 72074 Tuebingen
> Germany
>
>
> http://www.maartenbuis.nl
> --------------------------
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>


-- 
Chiara Mussida
PhD candidate
Doctoral school of Economic Policy
Catholic University, Piacenza (Italy)
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index