Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: mmregress question


From   bcoric@efst.hr
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: mmregress question
Date   Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:56:11 +0100 (CET)

Than you Steve.

I was using sregress and mmregress respectively as it stressed at the p.
444. However, results change significantly in each case when I repeat
these two commands.

You suggest that the reason is that the algorithm implemented in stata
starts by randomly picking N subset of p observation.
Could you please tell me how to set same N subsets before implement
mmregress.

Could you also tell me please do you have any recommendation how to select
appropriate results. Namely, selection of different starting subset will
probably result with different results again. If this is the case than,
question is, how to select appropriate starting subsample?

Bruno

>
> The FAQ ask that you give precise references; in this case you are
> presumably referring to: Verardi, V., & Croux, C. (2009). Robust
> regression in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(3), 439-453.
>
> The article states that -mmregress- starts with an initial S-estimator and
>  (page 444) that
>
> "The algorithm implemented in Stata for computing the S-estimator starts
> by randomly picking N subsets of p observation (defined as p-subset) where
> p is the number of regression parameters to estimate."
>
> In other words, unless the same seed is -set- before each instance of
> -mmregress-,  one would expect the results to differ from run to run.
>
> Also, if there are indicator ("dummy") variables in your model,
> -mmregress- will have problems (p 445). If you have dummies,  you should
> instead run -msregress-, part of the same package, and list them only with
> the dummy() option.
>
> If you still are having difficulties, I suggest that you contact the
> package's authors.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:59 PM, bcoric@efst.hr wrote:
>
> I would like to ask for help with implementation of stata command
> mmregress.
> I am doing simple cross section analysis. Since I have just 48
> observations I am very much concerned about the possible influence of
> outliers.
> Previously I was using stata command rreg for such chases. However, I came
> across the paper, Robust regression in Stata (2009), which argues that
> rreg command does not have expected robustness properties and recommend
> mmregress instead.
> However, I faced some problems in its implementation. Namely, its
> subsequent implementation to the same model leads to different values of
> regression coefficients. Moreover, detected outliers also change.
> I presume, that algorithm use iterative procedure taking previous
> estimates as starting values. However, results are very different in
> respect to the sign, size and significance of coefficients, and do not
> converge after subsequent applications.
> Does anyone can tell me is there anything, some procedure that I should
> follow, to get robust (consistent) results.
> Bruno Coric
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index