Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: mmregress question |

Date |
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 18:11:48 -0500 |

The FAQ ask that you give precise references; in this case you are presumably referring to: Verardi, V., & Croux, C. (2009). Robust regression in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(3), 439-453. The article states that -mmregress- starts with an initial S-estimator and (page 444) that "The algorithm implemented in Stata for computing the S-estimator starts by randomly picking N subsets of p observation (defined as p-subset) where p is the number of regression parameters to estimate." In other words, unless the same seed is -set- before each instance of -mmregress-, one would expect the results to differ from run to run. Also, if there are indicator ("dummy") variables in your model, -mmregress- will have problems (p 445). If you have dummies, you should instead run -msregress-, part of the same package, and list them only with the dummy() option. If you still are having difficulties, I suggest that you contact the package's authors. Steve On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:59 PM, bcoric@efst.hr wrote: I would like to ask for help with implementation of stata command mmregress. I am doing simple cross section analysis. Since I have just 48 observations I am very much concerned about the possible influence of outliers. Previously I was using stata command rreg for such chases. However, I came across the paper, Robust regression in Stata (2009), which argues that rreg command does not have expected robustness properties and recommend mmregress instead. However, I faced some problems in its implementation. Namely, its subsequent implementation to the same model leads to different values of regression coefficients. Moreover, detected outliers also change. I presume, that algorithm use iterative procedure taking previous estimates as starting values. However, results are very different in respect to the sign, size and significance of coefficients, and do not converge after subsequent applications. Does anyone can tell me is there anything, some procedure that I should follow, to get robust (consistent) results. Bruno Coric * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: mmregress question***From:*bcoric@efst.hr

**References**:**st: mmregress question***From:*bcoric@efst.hr

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Computation Speed for Bootstrapping** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Event within dates** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: mmregress question** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: mmregress question** - Index(es):