Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples


From   Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples
Date   Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:35:41 +0200

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Jianhong Chen wrote:
> First, I used -nbreg, dv iv moderator iv*moderator-
<snip>
> Then, I used nbreg, dv iv moderator iv*moderator, irr
<snip>
> So when I report the results in the table, I will use IRR, not coef,
> right?

The really important thing is that you and your audience understands
what the numbers you report mean. So, pick whichever you think you
understand and can explain to your audience.

> Do you have a published paper who also used
> the same approach for my reference?

<http://www.stata.com/bookstore/regmodcdvs.html>

-- Maarten


--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany


http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index