Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples |

Date |
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:12:43 +0200 |

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Jianhong Chen wrote: > Thank you very much for your response. I read your article on Stata > Journal and I think you are completely right. Just to make sure that > I understand right, are the exponentiated coefficients you mentioned > the same coefficients which I can get after runing negative binomial > model? The magic option is -irr-, just as I did in the example I posted earlier. > Also, since the reviewers require that we should compare marginal > effect, we have no chance to avoid that and we plan to use the > marginal effects as supplemental analysis, not main analysis. Do you > have any idea to do t-test of marginal effects of two subsample? Typically, my response to the reviewer would be something like: "We agree with the reviewer that a substantive interpretation of the parameters would improve the article. We have chosen to do so in the form of rate ratios rather than marginal effects as that way we avoid the problem that correct marginal effects of interaction terms tend to be so variable across individuals that a one number summary, like a mean marginal effect, is hard to justify (Ai and Norton 2003)." Hope this helps, Maarten Ai, C., and E. Norton. 2003. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters 80: 123–129 -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples***From:*Jianhong Chen <jianhongchen1985@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples***From:*Jianhong Chen <jianhongchen1985@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples***From:*Jianhong Chen <jianhongchen1985@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples***From:*Jianhong Chen <jianhongchen1985@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: R: variable not found?** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Machine spec for 70GB data, Summary** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples** - Index(es):