Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: svy subpop option and e(sample)

From   Austin Nichols <>
Subject   Re: st: svy subpop option and e(sample)
Date   Wed, 25 May 2011 14:39:43 -0400

Recall this conversation from 2007:

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Richard Williams
<> wrote:

> As a sidelight, one of the things that has always bothered me about subpop
> is that you are apparently never supposed to create an extract from your
> data, e.g. you could have 100 million cases and only be interested in a
> subpopulation of 10,000, but you are nonetheless supposed to keep all 100
> million cases in your data set so the standard errors are right. I always
> wonder how horrible it would be if you just made the extract or used -if-
> instead of subpop. If, say, the standard errors might be off by .01%, I
> suspect I could live with that.
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index