Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Nominal or ordinal?

From   Clive Nicholas <>
Subject   Re: st: Nominal or ordinal?
Date   Fri, 13 Aug 2010 03:50:29 +0100

Richard Williams replied:

> I didn't realize that -mlogtest- was originally an STB program.  I don't
> know if it has changed much over the years, but the most current version is
> contained in -spost9-, available on Scott Long's web site. ( -findit spost9-
> ). The spost9 suite has a lot of other useful programs, including -brant-,
> which tests whether the assumptions of the ordered logit model are violated.

I was going to mention -spost9-, but nothing comes up either for -h
spost9- or -h mlogtest-, so I chose to cite the earlier reference for
the sake of some clarity over none. Good catch regarding -brant-: I'd
forgotten about that, but that test does come with health warnings.
But then, they all do.

Clive Nicholas

[Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
<>. Please respond to contributions I make in
a list thread here. Thanks!]

"My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about
methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index