Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: Concordance

From   "Nick Cox" <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: Concordance
Date   Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:59:22 -0000

Thanks to Tom for mentioning -concord-, which is by Thomas Steichen and

In fact, a more recent version of -concord- than that on SSC is
downloadable from the Stata Journal website, as -search concord-

If Ricardo had used -search concordance- he would got to this advice
from Tom Trikalinos and myself in a matter of seconds. 

The Statalist FAQ mentions the use of -search- as a way to solve your
problems, as do many introductions to Stata. 


Tom Trikalinos

i'm off to a meeting -- thus not time for a proper response, but these
are pointers.

1. difference vs average plots
2. Lin's concoradance correlation coefficient rather than Pearson
3. (reduced) major axis regression and related regressions ([weighted
] Deming, Passing-Bablock[spelling may be off?]) rather than OLS>

ssc install concord

will get you quite far actually.
N. orsini had written a deming routine i f I racall correctly.

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Ricardo Ovaldia <>

> Glucose on 100 serum samples was measured by two different methods. I
would like to examine the concordance between the two set of
measurements. The glucose values are continuous, so I was thinking about
simply computing Pearson's correlation coefficient, but that seems too
simple and the test is not very sensitive. Is there a better way to
assess concordance between two repeated measurements.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index