Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: bivariate probit using -gllamm-


From   Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: bivariate probit using -gllamm-
Date   Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:25:06 -0600

I see. Well then interest in -gllamm- is indeed justified.

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Dimitrije Tišma <dimitrijetisma@gmail.com>wrote:

> Well, I wanted more than just to reproduce -biprobit- results. If it
> is possible to do joint estimations with -gllamm- I could (or, I
> believe I could, please correct me if I am wrong) also get random
> effects and their respective probabilities by using appropriate
> -gllamm- options, such as ip(f). And this is, to best of my knowledge,
> not possible with -biprobit- or -mvprobit-. Best,
>
-- 
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index