Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: bivariate probit using -gllamm-

From   Dimitrije Tišma <>
Subject   Re: st: bivariate probit using -gllamm-
Date   Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:26:23 +0100

Well, I wanted more than just to reproduce -biprobit- results. If it
is possible to do joint estimations with -gllamm- I could (or, I
believe I could, please correct me if I am wrong) also get random
effects and their respective probabilities by using appropriate
-gllamm- options, such as ip(f). And this is, to best of my knowledge,
not possible with -biprobit- or -mvprobit-. Best,


2010/3/3 Stas Kolenikov <>:
> Why do you want to use -gllamm- for this? -biprobit- should be way faster.
> It is probably doable, but you would need to impose some odd constraints
> like unit loadings of the common latent variable in both equations.
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Dimitrije Tišma
> <>wrote:
>> I was wondering if it is possible to do a bivariate probit regression
>> using -gllamm- rather than the built-in comman -biprobit-. If yes,
>> what would be the basic syntax? I have looked up everywhere (or at
>> least I think I did), -gllamm- manual included, but haven´t found a
>> lot on this. Thanks!
> --
> Stas Kolenikov, also found at
> Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> *

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index