Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: Re: AW: asis option


From   "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: Re: AW: asis option
Date   Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:35:57 +0100

<>

The bottom line may well be that there is _no_ way to force Stata to do what
you want...


HTH
Martin


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Klink, Andrew
Sent: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2010 21:31
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st: Re: AW: asis option

I have considered the maximization options. I do not wish to change the
iterate() or ltolerance() in particular (in fact, when I increased the
ltolerance to 1e-1 nothing changed (still flat region error) despite the
iterated log likelihoods being < 0.1 apart).  Reducing the number of
iterations does result in the model completing with an output, although many
estimates and 95% CIs are missing for variables. I am not sure how changes
to the other options would help ³push² the model to give me estimates.

-Andy


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index