Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Which weight


From   "Sergiy Radyakin" <serjradyakin@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Which weight
Date   Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:44:08 +0200

Dear Steven,

your answer to Nikolaos' question sounds perfectly reasonable. But is
there also a straightforward answer in the following situtations?

Situation A: N households were chosen at time t0 and followed as a
panel. M households were added to the panel at t1 (t0<t1). At any
point t I have crossectional weights and a probability to stay in the
sample for each household. At any moment t an event of interest can
happen in the houshold, (e.g. a child leaves the household). In this
case I add the characteristics of  the household at time t [and may be
t-1] to "my" sample). Which weights should I use? I obviously can't
choose weights at t0 because not all households were in the sample at
t0 and I can't use the weights at t1 because some of the households,
for which the event of interest has occured before t1, have dropped
out before t1 due to panel mortality.

Situation B: N households are chosen at time t0 and M households are
chosen at t1. pweights are given. However, during the time between t0
and t1, the population (e.g. the population of a country), from which
the samples were drawn has changed (e.g. doubled in size). I am
working with a pooled sample of households (N+M).  Which weights can I
use?
If I am working with one subpopulation only (e.g. men) and the
proportion of these cases has changed, can I still pool observations?
(E.g. women/men=50/50 in t0 but women/men=60/40 in t1). If yes, what
interpretation do I give to the estimates then? [this is not a panel
case]

Is there any good online guide on longitudinal weights? Preferrably
with plain examples on how to deal with different situations as
outlined above?

Thank you,
   Sergiy


On 10/7/07, Steven Joel Hirsch Samuels <sjhsamuels@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Nikkos, for a 'longitudinal' analysis like this, the general rule is
> to use the earliest weight. The sampling probability' is set when the
> unit is first selected.  The final weights differ from year to year
> because of post-stratification adjustments. To properly specify -
> svyset- you will need stratum and clustering information from the
> study documentation.
>
>
> Steven
>
>
> On Oct 7, 2007, at 7:06 AM, Nikolaos Kanellopoulos wrote:
>
> >
> > I have a dataset in wide format. I want to see the correlation
> > between x1
> > and x2 (the same variable in two different years). I want to use
> > weights to
> > correct for unequal sampling probabilities. Should I use the
> > weights of the
> > first year or the weights from the second?
>
>
> sjhsamuels@earthlink.net
> 18 Cantine's Island
> Saugerties, NY 12477
> Phone: 845-246-0774
> EFax: 208-498-7441
>
>
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index