[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
RE: st: qreg SEs
If it is NOT satisfactory, then why don't YOU make it satisfactory,
I am quite puzzled why you CANNOT contribute but can blame others? I
did NOT accuse anything but just stated my experience.
BTW, I did NOT say that ALL Stata's SEs are hardly correct.
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Ricardo
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: st: qreg SEs
--- Shinkyu Yang <email@example.com> first wrote
that the way Stata computes SE was incorrect:
> As far as I know, qreq does not produce the right
> SEs. There are several ways to construct standard
> error. I will tell further if you cannot find ways
> to construct SEs.
Frank Eaton <FEaton@NFOCFgroup.com> ask for more
> Please do tell me more, thank you!
--- Shinkyu Yang <firstname.lastname@example.org> then wrote:
> As others already mentioned, Reference qreg part
> explains bootstrap
> method to construct SEs. My experience told me that
> the Stata's SEs
> were hardly correct.
This is NOT satisfactory, Shinkyu Yang, you stated
that Stata's SE are wrong but do not provide any
supporting evidence. This leaves us, who routinely use
-qreg-, wandering if you are correct and Stata is
wrong or what? If Stata is computing incorrect SE, I
and I'm sure Stata, would want to know this.
I think that is a terrible disservice to Stata and
users to state on this list that something is computed
incorrectly without providing adequate evidence.
Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
Oklahoma City, OK
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
* For searches and help try:
ORG:New York University
ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;44 West 4th St.=0D=0ASuite 8-94;New York;NY;10012;United States of America
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:44 West 4th St.=0D=0ASuite 8-94=0D=0ANew York, NY 10012=0D=0AUnited States o=