Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: qreg SEs


From   Marcello Pagano <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: qreg SEs
Date   Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:08:17 -0500

OK.  A little quieter reasoning will achieve a lot more.
There seems to be a miscommunication here.  Please try and
understand what each other is saying before answering.

Thank you both,

m.p.


Shinkyu Yang wrote:
> 
> If it is NOT satisfactory, then why don't YOU make it satisfactory,
> Ricardo Ovaldia?
> 
> I am quite puzzled why you CANNOT contribute but can blame others?  I
> did NOT accuse anything but just stated my experience.
> 
> BTW, I did NOT say that ALL Stata's SEs are hardly correct.
> 
> Skyang
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ricardo
> Ovaldia
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: qreg SEs
> 
> --- Shinkyu Yang <[email protected]> first wrote
> that the way Stata computes SE was incorrect:
> 
> > As far as I know, qreq does not produce the right
> > SEs. There are several ways to construct standard
> > error.  I will tell further if you cannot find ways
> > to construct SEs.
> 
> Frank Eaton <[email protected]> ask for more
> detail
> 
> > Please do tell me more, thank you!
> 
> --- Shinkyu Yang <[email protected]> then wrote:
> 
> > As others already mentioned, Reference qreg part
> > explains bootstrap
> > method to construct SEs. My experience told me that
> > the  Stata's SEs
> > were hardly correct.
> 
> This is NOT satisfactory, Shinkyu Yang, you stated
> that Stata's SE are wrong but do not provide any
> supporting evidence. This leaves us, who routinely use
> -qreg-, wandering if you are correct and Stata is
> wrong or what? If Stata is computing incorrect SE, I
> and I'm sure Stata, would want to know this.
> 
> I think that is a terrible disservice to Stata and
> users to state on this list that something is computed
> incorrectly without providing adequate evidence.
> 
> Best,
> Ricardo.
> 
> =====
> Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
> Statistician
> Oklahoma City, OK
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index