Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: qreg SEs


From   "Erik Ø. Sørensen" <sameos@mac.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: qreg SEs
Date   Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:19:40 -0500

On onsdag, feb 26, 2003, at 19:49 Canada/Eastern, Shinkyu Yang wrote:
If it is NOT satisfactory, then why don't YOU make it satisfactory,
Ricardo Ovaldia?
You are the one who claimed stata's -qreg- standard errors are wrong. This is a strong claim. Papers have been published on the assumption that they are right. If you have evidence that they are wrong, you should provide it. If you have no evidence, it is my opinion that you should refrain from making such strong statements in a public forum. You should certainly not demand that other people not affiliated with statacorp should prove the Stata standard errors to be right.

kind regards,
Erik Sørensen

--
Erik Ø. Sørensen, <http://www.geocities.com/erik_oiolf/>.
phd student (economics), Norwegian School of Economics.
currently visiting Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index