Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: SAS PROC GLIMMIX vs. Stata generalized linear mixed model commands
From
Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>
To
Multilevel modelling discussion list <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject
st: SAS PROC GLIMMIX vs. Stata generalized linear mixed model commands
Date
Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:59:23 -0500
Folks,
Does anybody know about the best way to match up what SAS and Stata do
in terms of multilevel / mixed models? Lesa Hoffman from U of
Nebraska, Lincoln, has been able to find a matching pair of options
(http://psych.unl.edu/hoffman/Sheets/Workshops/ICPSR4_Example10b_Generalized_Clustered_Models.pdf)
for Gauss-Hermite quadrature with a fixed number of integration
points:
SAS:
PROC GLIMMIX DATA=... METHOD = QUAD (QPOINTS=7);
CLASS ... ;
MODEL response = predictors / SOLUTION LINK=LOGIT DIST=BIN DDFM=BW;
RANDOM INTERCEPT / TYPE=UN SUBJECT = cluster;
RUN;
Stata:
xtmelogit response predictors, || cluster: , variance
covariance(unstructured) intpoints(7)
Are there any other estimation methods for generalized linear mixed
models (in particular, mixed/multilevel logistic model) that these two
packages have in common?
-- Stas Kolenikov, PhD, PStat (ASA, SSC)
-- Principal Survey Scientist, Abt SRBI
-- Opinions stated in this email are mine only, and do not reflect the
position of my employer
-- http://stas.kolenikov.name
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/