Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |
To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | Re: st: Re: Creating a Peer-Variable excluding the focal entity |
Date | Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:01:01 +0000 |
So far as I am concerned there is only one principle here, which is that we can't be expected to answer impossible questions. Your first question was, I believe, impossible to answer precisely, but I referred you to sources of guidance. Your second question was, I believe, impossible to answer precisely. Perhaps you would prefer me to walk away from such questions, as I often do, but I am trying to hang in here and be clear that you really do need to explain what you want. I am looking at again at firm 1, which is in sector 1. I copy and paste your last output to establish that again. firm year sector Visibility Peer Visibility > 1 2009 1 4.2 4.7 Are you saying that the peer visibility is to be calculated for firms in the other sector at the same time? Otherwise, why are you using firms from sector 2. Alternatively, giving a word definition of the exact definition. Nick njcoxstata@gmail.com On 26 March 2014 14:46, Houdou Basse Mama <hbassemama@escpeurope.eu> wrote: > Dear Nick > I have no pretention to compete. In contrast, I am searching for guidance. > I computed manually (in Excel) the 4.7 as the mean of 4.6 and 4.8 that respectively pertain to firm 2 and 3 for the year 2009. Both firms 2 and 3 belong to sector (industry) #2. My question is: Can a Stata algorithm help me efficiently perform this task for a broader sample? > I am sorry for the misunderstanding if you feel like your guidance to be misused. > > Best > Houdou > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Houdou Basse Mama" <hbassemama@escpeurope.eu> > An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 15:18:36 > Betreff: Re: Creating a Peer-Variable excluding the focal entity > > Many thanks Nick for your guidance. > > I would like to specify my question. Suppose, you have 7 firms belonging to two different sectors 1 and 2. Each firm-year observation is associated with a media visibility measure. What I want ot compute is the variable "Peer Visibility" as I did it for Firm 1 over the period 2009-2013. This latter variable is industry-year computed and varies over the 7 firms. I append an example below: > > firm year sector Visibility Peer Visibility > 1 2009 1 4.2 4.7 > 1 2010 1 9.7 9.6 > 1 2011 1 5.2 4.2 > 1 2012 1 9.3 9.5 > 1 2013 1 6.1 5 > 2 2009 1 4.6 > 2 2010 1 9.4 > 2 2011 1 4.6 > 2 2012 1 9.3 > 2 2013 1 4.9 > 3 2009 1 4.8 > 3 2010 1 9.8 > 3 2011 1 3.8 > 3 2012 1 9.7 > 3 2013 1 5.1 > 4 2009 2 5.2 > 4 2010 2 9.3 > 4 2011 2 3.6 > 4 2012 2 9.2 > 4 2013 2 6.3 > 5 2009 2 7 > 5 2010 2 9.1 > 5 2011 2 3.5 > 5 2012 2 9.2 > 5 2013 2 7.3 > 6 2009 2 6.9 > 6 2010 2 9.5 > 6 2011 2 4.4 > 6 2012 2 9.1 > 6 2013 2 7 > 7 2009 2 6.9 > 7 2010 2 9.7 > 7 2011 2 4.6 > 7 2012 2 9 > 7 2013 2 6.8 > > I hope I could specify the issue. Thanks in advance for your help > Houdou > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Houdou Basse Mama" <hbassemama@escpeurope.eu> > An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. März 2014 11:33:10 > Betreff: Creating a Peer-Variable excluding the focal entity > > Dear Statalist, > > Could you please provide assistance. I attempt (with no success) to create a peer group variable each period excluding a focal firm j. Suppose I want to regress a firm's outcome (y_jit) on a vector X that contains two variables. The outcome y_jit should be regressed on X_jit and X_-jit, where the former varibale denotes the a firm-specific determinant of Y_jit and a peer group counterpart, respectively. I need to construct the peer group variable (X_-jit) that excludes the firm itself. > > Assume a variable "visibility" that is firm-specific. I want to compute a peer-counterpart for this firm-specific variable using industry affiliation as peer group. Call this new variable "peer_visibility". The computed variable should be industry-year computed. > > I have read the points made in the thread in statalist since October through December 2013 but still cannot solve the problem. Many thanks in advance for your help. > > Best and many thanks for your time > > Houdou > ESCP Europe Berlin Campus > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/