Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Fwd: -cmp- not concave
From 
 
"Z. Liu" <[email protected]> 
To 
 
[email protected] 
Subject 
 
Re: st: Fwd: -cmp- not concave 
Date 
 
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 02:44:00 +0000 
Hi DVM,
Many thanks for your kind help. That plus sign is a typo. My apology. It 
turns out that I made a mistake with the indicators option. I'm redoing 
the model now. Will also try the -bitobit- command. Thanks a lot.
Best Regards,
Leo
On 2014-03-07 02:30, Dimitriy V. Masterov wrote:
Leo,
Your syntax seems nonstandard to me, particularly the plus sign,
though that doesn't seem to be the problem.
Does the user-written bitobit work by any chance?
DVM
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Z. Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear all,
I've been trying to fit a bivariate tobit model using the user-written
command -cmp-. The model looks like this:
cmp (equation1: y1 = X1) (equation2: y2 = y1 + X2), indicators(2 2) 
robust
This model doesn't work out. Stata keeps showing 'log pseudolikelihood 
= 0
(not concave)'. I tried to start with minimum regressors (1-2 
explanatory
variables) in each equation, but the problem remains. I also tried
alternative ml options such as - tech(dfp)- and -difficult- but still 
can't
fix it. However, the two tobit equations can be estimated separately,
although the Pseudo R2 is quite small (around 5%). As well, the system 
model
can be estimated if I change the two tobit equations into linear 
equations.
Some descriptive statistics of the two dependent variables are as 
follows:
y1: Percentiles: 1% (0), 25% (0), 50% (23.57), 99% (6127.14); mean 
(365.00);
SD (1186.90); Skewness (7.14); Kurtosis (71.23)
y2: Percentiles: 1% (0), 50% (0), 75% (0), 90% (78.10), 99% (1128.53); 
mean
(61.29); SD (401.82); Skewness (13.27); Kurtosis (217.49)
Anybody out there knows what might be the problem? Any advice or 
suggestions
would be appreciated. Thanks a lot in advance.
Best Regards,
Leo
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/