Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: st: Problems with FE and Hausman test


From   "John Templeton" <cynic@iname.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: Re: st: Problems with FE and Hausman test
Date   Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:14:02 -0500

Thank you, this makes perfect sense now! So I could run

> xtreg, PERCENTGRAD IV1 IV2 IV3 IV4 IV5 IV6 IV7 IV8 Timeis2007, Timeis2008, be

And yes, I acknowledge that the rest of the model takes for granted every other thing ("says that they are the ONLY factors (other than geography and time) that affect the outcome.") But that's part of my focus, the argument that solution is just administrative/organizational and not in terms of funding and other things. My guess is that administrative/organizational changes help, but that a large portion can be attrbiuted to other things. 

----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher Baum
Sent: 02/20/14 08:20 AM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: Re: st: Problems with FE and Hausman test
 
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index