Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: RE: Using command svy glm to obtain risk ratios


From   jose maria pacheco de souza <jmpsouza@usp.br>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: RE: RE: Using command svy glm to obtain risk ratios
Date   Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:49:45 -0300

Em 18/02/2014 03:41, Steve Samuels escreveu:
I replied to Jose Maria privately with copies of the do files. The paper
was:
Waltermaurer, E, M Butsashvili, N Avaliani, S Samuels, and LA McNutt.
2013. An examination of domestic partner violence and its justification
in the Republic of Georgia. BMC Womens Health 13, no. 1: 44.
and is at:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/13/44
It contained only the -svy: glm- analyses.

To correct an error: In some instances of -svy: poisson-, the CI for a
predicted *risk*, not the estimated RR, exceeded 1.0.

log relative risk regression was the choice of my co-authors. My
personal choice  would have been -svy: logistic-, followed by -margins-
for interpretation of risks.

Steve
sjsamuels@gmail.com


Steve was very kind.
Thank you.

Now, maybe following the thread: for the interpretation of risks after *svy logistic*, would it be possible to use *predict pr, pr* instead of *margins*?
josé maria
--
Jose Maria Pacheco de Souza
Professor Titular (aposentado), Professor Senior
Departamento de Epidemiologia/Faculdade de Saude Publica, USP
Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715
01246-904  -  S. Paulo/SP - Brasil
fone (11)3768-8612
www.fsp.usp.br/~jmpsouza
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index