Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Boon Han Koh <bhkoh@unimelb.edu.au> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: Marginal effects in probit regressions with inteff, testing significance using lincom |

Date |
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:16:44 +0000 |

Good day, I am currently running a probit model with categorical variables representing treatments in an experiment. For simplicity, the variables x1, x2 and x3 represent treatments 1, 2 and 3 respectively. In our experiment, we made use of 6 treatment combinations: (a) None of x1, x2 and x3 (b) x1 only (c) x1 and x2 (d) x1, x2 and x3 (e) x1 and x3 (f) x3 only The dependent variable y is the probability an individual participates in the project. (A side note: Because there are no combinations where treatment 2 only is employed, x2 is the variable which takes the value of 1 if treatment 2 is used in addition to treatment 1.) We ran the probit regression of y on x1, x2, x3, and x1*x3 and x2*x3, and calculated marginal effects using -margins- and -inteff- (Ai and Norton, 2003; Norton et al, 2004) separately. The nature of -inteff- implies that we have to run the code twice to separately work out the marginal effects of x1*x3 and x2*x3. Here's my question: If we want to test the effectiveness of a particular combination of treatment (say treatments 1 & 3 together), technically it means that we want to compare combination (e) against combination (a). This means that we need to test the null hypothesis that x1 + x3 + x1*x3 = 0. Given, however, that the marginal effects of the interaction effects (x1*x2 and x2*x3) are calculated using -inteff- separately, how can we use Stata to test the null hypothesis that a linear combination of coefficients (plus interaction terms) = 0? Is it appropriate to save the output of inteff and then use -lincom- on the saved output? However, the marginal effects of the individual explanatory variables under -inteff- are different from that calculated using -margins- Thanks and appreciate anyone's help on this. If you require me to explain further I will be happy to do so. Regards, Boon Han * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: re: re: re: st: mediation analysis with proportional data** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Drawing from a known, non-regular, discrete distribution** - Previous by thread:
**st: Estimating adjusted prevalence from logistic model** - Next by thread:
**st: putexcel with a loop** - Index(es):