Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: cointegration and unit choice


From   Ricardo Fernandez <[email protected]>
To   "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject   st: cointegration and unit choice
Date   Sun, 5 Jan 2014 09:19:22 +0000

I have a little bit of trouble with the interpretation of how different unit-choices affect whether two variables can be cointegrated:

In case a) I run a unit root test on a variable Y, measured as % change compared to the previous year. The dfuller test rejects the null of a unit root, implying a stationary process I(0) and therefore no cointegration would be possible with variable X.

In case b) I run a unit root test on the same variable Y measured in logs o f the absolute values. The dfuller test does NOT reject the unit root. In addition, I take first differences and find an I(1) process for Y. My variable X is also I(1) so I can therefore test for cointegration. In my example, X and Y are cointegrated. 

So, Y cannot be cointegrated with variable X  when measured in % (because the process is stationary) but cointegration exists when measured in logs. The puzzling thing is that the first difference of the logs is almost identical to the % change. Thus, it looks like the unit root is case a) is rejected because I am already looking at a differenced series (i.e. the difference of the logs). Does this make sense at all?

Thanks!
Ricardo

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index