Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Hussein, Mustafa (Mustafa Hussien)" <mhussei4@uthsc.edu> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: Difference in Difference vs. Fixed Effects |

Date |
Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:51:41 +0000 |

Hi Joerg, Can you post your results? You say that "treatment" was omitted from xtreg output. So what are you comparing your reg coefficients to then? In fixed effects I think you should be able specify a dummy for treatment. Mustafa ________________________________________ From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] on behalf of Joerg Lang [joerglang0@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 1:26 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: Difference in Difference vs. Fixed Effects Dear Stalist users, currently writing my Master thesis and working with Stata 12, I have the following problem. I have a dataset on two time periods (2010 and 2012) and two groups (treatment and control). There is no treatment in the baseline and the treatment group uptakes the treatment between 2010 and 2012. The uptake is non-random. Now, I want to estimate the impact in a difference in difference design. At first, I estimate the following model: y b0+b1Time+b2Treatment+b3Time*Treatment+u using the -reg command: -reg y time treatment time*treatment, cluster (h1) while y is the outcome variable that is between 0 and 1 and h1 is the household identifier. I use the cluster option to account for the problem of serial correlation. In a second estimation I also include some other covariates. I always thought that this setting and a setting with fixed effects yield exactly the same result as long as one has only two points in time (in my case 2010 and 2012). However, estimating the same model with: - xtreg y Time Treatment Time*Treatment, fe vce(cluster h1) gives slightly different results. The difference increases when including more covariates, which are the same in both cases. As well, there is no variation in the households. Thus, the same households and the same variables are used in both estimations. Obviously, treatment is omitted in the xtreg case since it does not vary between time. However, I think that this should not change anything. My question is: Is my model correctly specified or did I overlook something? And, if my estimation is correct: Why this difference? Is this "normal"? If so, what does it tell me then, i.e. what is the reason for it? Since I have already been stuck with this problem for quite a while, any help or literature suggestions would be very much appreciated. Hope this question is not too trivial for you. Best regards, Joerg * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: RE: Difference in Difference vs. Fixed Effects***From:*Joerg Lang <joerglang0@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Difference in Difference vs. Fixed Effects***From:*Joerg Lang <joerglang0@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: -destring- and missing values** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: -destring- and missing values** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Difference in Difference vs. Fixed Effects** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Difference in Difference vs. Fixed Effects** - Index(es):