Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Vikash Vaibhav <vikashv@igidr.ac.in> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | st: Different result of Technical Efficiency with Frontier 4.1 and Stata |
| Date | Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:52:54 +0530 |
This is with respect to the dramatically different result that i got when i compared the results of technical efficiency estimated from Frontier 4.1 and Stata. (two more student here has the same problem and with a different dataset). I do not think that it could have been due to differing algorithms or some other things that vary across statistical packages. I would like to point out the following observations: 1. The results were different in case of cross section data. But they did not differ a lot. 2. The results for the panel data were hugely different with the two software. I have used Stata IC version11.1 (for windows). I have used Frontier 4.1 package freely available on CEPA website. Any help ?? -- Thanks & Regards, Vikash vaibhav * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/