Re: st: predict, condpb

[Stefan Bernhard <stefanbernhard88@gmail.com>]

Thanks for the reply nick,

but I tried all version #: from 1 to 11 now and always the error
"option condpb not allowed".

I found a stata-journal article from 2002 where the syntax of predict
looks like this:

predict  type newvarname  if exp  in range  , statistic

Where the condpb and pb were set with statistic.

http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0017

It seems like that was for Stata 7 and the predict command has
undergone significant changes sometime in between. Or could it have to
do anything with having to run nlogitrum first? (In the do-file, the
predict is after an nlogit)

best, stefan bernhard,

2013/8/6 Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>:
> Try a prefix such as
>
> version 5: predict x1, condpb
>
> for any value of "5" that works.
>
> See also the -help- for -version-.
>
> Nick
> njcoxstata@gmail.com
>
>
> On 6 August 2013 12:08, Stefan Bernhard <stefanbernhard88@gmail.com> wrote:
>> dear statalisters,
>>
>> i have a do file that was written some time ago that contains
>>
>> predict x1, condpb
>> predict x2, pb
>>
>> apparently, the options condpb and pb are no longer allowed in newer
>> versions of stata (I use stata 12).
>>
>> Is there any way to do whatever those options did before (I just want
>> to replace these commands with something that gives me the same output
>> as those would have in an older version of stata)?
>>
>> best, stefan bernhard,
>> *
>> *   For searches and help try:
>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/