Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Midas
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: Midas
Date
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:35:12 +0000
Claudia, Setor:
Please heed requests in the FAQ:
0. "does not seem to be working" could mean about 20 different things.
Please spell out your evidence.
1. Explain where user-written commands you refer to come from
(-metan-, -midas-?).
2. Don't use obscure references that are likely to be unclear to many
(Revman?).
3. "Stata", not "STATA".
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Setor Kunutsor <[email protected]> wrote:
> Have a look at the help file for metan and let me know if it helps
>
> .help metan
[email protected]
> I am trying to use MIDAS for a systematic review.
>
> The command:
> midas tp fp fn tn, bfor ford
> midas tp fp fn tn, bfor
> midas tp fp fn tn, ford
>
> does not seem to be working. I am trying to get a similar output to Revman with the description of the studies on the left and then the forest plot for sensitivity and specificity on the right.
>
> I am using STATA 12.
>
> Does anyone have experience with this and can help?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/