Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: spatial weights which also take into account time |

Date |
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:05:01 +0000 |

A very general answer is 1. Many programs support weights of various kinds. 2. If you want your weights to depend on several variables, that's often fine: you just have to compute them. 3. The syntax is typically [<weighttype> = <exp>] so that the <exp> can depend on several variables. Often it would be a product or a dividend. 4. The general syntax (literally -syntax-) for checking weights and the specific ways that weights are handled within a program should be considered separate matters. (At the worst end, I've seen user programs support specification of weights but then ignore them, it being supposed by novice programmers that it's sufficient to allow weights via a -syntax- statement.) All that said, your specific problem sounds like a case for using an -if- restriction, not more complicated weights, but I can't comment authoritatively on -spwmatrix-. Nick On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Ben Hoen <bhoen@lbl.gov> wrote: > I have been unsuccessful in my search this morning for a way to deal with > both space and time (or for that matter any other variable other than space) > in developing a spatial weights matrix. ALERT: I am a novice - slowly > learning - about spatial models. > > The k nearest neighbors options in some user written programs (e.g., > spwmatrix - SSC) allows me to limit the number of neighbors based on > "nearness". Alternatively I could use some cutoff distance (e.g., 1 mile) > to limit the collection of "neighbors". But in addition to distance I would > like to use time to limit my data. For example I have home transactions > that I want to test for spatial autocorrelation between. I concern myself > with BOTH the k (e.g., 5) nearest neighbors that ALSO transacted within the > previous year. (I.e., using a transaction that occurred, for example, 10 > years later does not make sense, even if it is "nearest".) > > Are there any ideas out there for how to limit the data based on both space > AND time in developing the weights matrix? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: spatial weights which also take into account time***From:*"Ben Hoen" <bhoen@lbl.gov>

**References**:**st: spatial weights which also take into account time***From:*"Ben Hoen" <bhoen@lbl.gov>

- Prev by Date:
**st: spatial weights which also take into account time** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Changing line color for more than 20 overlaid twoway line plots** - Previous by thread:
**st: spatial weights which also take into account time** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: spatial weights which also take into account time** - Index(es):