Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Aljar Meesters <aljar.meesters@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Explanatories that vary only over time in panel data |

Date |
Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:17:01 +0100 |

Estimating a panel regression model where variable(s) do not vary over individuals is possible, as long as they vary over time. The same holds for adding a time trend to your model. Of course, the variable(s) that you want to add should not be collinear with the time trend. I do not completely understand what you mean with: "If we just repeat the price entries for all i districts in our input data we assume that Stata will think that there are in fact multiple observations. So the standard errors can not be correct.". You have these multiple observations per district, so, why should the standard errors not be correct? Maybe what worries you is your assumption that all prices are equal between all districts. I do not know if such an assumption is justified. You can take the average Y over districts and regress Y_t = a + b*X_t + c*t instead. Best, Aljar 2013/1/30 ARDE DE <wsbbarde@gmail.com>: > Dear All: > > Our question is about both, the theory of panel data analysis and > (later on) its implementation in Stata. > > The model we have in mind is: > Y_it = a_i + b*X_it + c*t + u_it, > i.e. the standard FE/RE framework but with a linear time trend. > One of our explanatory variables in X_it does not vary across > individuals, it only varies across time (it is a price variable that > is assumed to be the same across all districts i within the country we > consider). > How do we tell Stata about this? > If we just repeat the price entries for all i districts in our input > data we assume that Stata will think that there are in fact multiple > observations. So the standard errors can not be correct. > The same question applies to our linear time trend c*t. Can we just > include the "year" variable repeatedly (although it does not vary > across the index i)? > > We were not able to find an answer in Wooldridge (2001): Econometric > Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, nor in Matyas et al. (2008): > The Econometrics of Panel Data, 3rd ed. > > Has someone used a similar model? > Any help/hints will be highly appreciated > > Arde > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Explanatories that vary only over time in panel data***From:*ARDE DE <wsbbarde@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: how to get hold of the observations used in reg2hdfe** - Next by Date:
**st: only keep obs of determinate string length** - Previous by thread:
**st: Explanatories that vary only over time in panel data** - Next by thread:
**st: Re-access a matrix in mata through a mata function** - Index(es):