Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Carlo Lazzaro" <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: R: Hausman test |
Date | Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:09:46 +0100 |
Carmen may want to take a look at: [R] hausman in r.pdf file (Base Reference manual of Stata 12.1). Page 713 covers the topic Carmen is interested in. Best regards, Carlo -----Messaggio originale----- Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di Carmen Blanco Inviato: lunedì 28 gennaio 2013 11:49 A: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Oggetto: st: Hausman test Dear statalist, I have some problem with Hausman test. When I compare between random effects and fixed effects with Hausman test, Stata reports me this: chi2(4) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B) = -45.27 chi2<0 ==> model fitted on these data fails to meet the asymptotic assumptions of the Hausman test; see suest for a generalized test Could someone tell me, please, how to solve this problem in order to know if my model is random or fixed effects? Thanks C.B. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/