Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: vce(analytic) for proportions-- what is it exactly? |
Date | Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:08:30 -0500 |
I apologize: you were looking at the _right_ command, but the wrong -help-. Steve Tamer, You are looking at the wrong commands and, therefore, the wrong -help-. If you have survey data, you must first run -svyset- and then use Stata's survey commands, such as -svy: proportion-. The default vce option for -svyset- is vce(linearized), also known as Taylor linearized.. Formulas are contained in Stata's Survey Manual or in any sampling text. (My favorite is Sharon Lohr, 2009. Sampling: Design and Analysis. Boston, MA: Cengage Brooks/Cole.) What are standard errors based on vce(analytic) in (non-survey) -proportion-? In the absence of weights or clusters, they are the formulas found in introductory texts: se = sqrt of P(1-P)/n. For a complex survey design (multiple stages, strata, weights), this formula would be quite wrong. Steve Steven Samuels Consulting Statistician 18 Cantine's Island Saugerties NY 12477 USA On Jan 16, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Tamer Farag wrote: Hello All, I am calculating survey weighted proportions using the svy: proportion command. The Stata help file states that the default for calculating variance is vce(analytic). Link below of the stata help file for proportion: http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?proportion Specifically, it states: ----+ SE/Cluster +------------------------------------------------------- vce(vcetype) specifies the type of standard error reported, which includes types that are derived from asymptotic theory, that allow for intragroup correlation, and that use bootstrap or jackknife methods; see [R] ( http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?vce_option )vce_option ( http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?vce_option ). vce(analytic), the default, uses the analytically derived variance estimator associated with the sample proportion. But just what is an "analytically derived variance estimator", exactly? Is there any reason not to use it? Many thanks, Tamer Confidentiality Statement: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/