Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: Fixed Effects estimation with time-invariant variables


From   Roman Wörner <h0953997@wu.ac.at>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: RE: Fixed Effects estimation with time-invariant variables
Date   Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:50:51 +0100

Hi Sybil,

thank you for your reply! Yes, that is what I did. I used -xtset- to identify the companies and years. As I expect the company characteristics to affect IEO I'd like to use a fixed effects model. Nevertheless, with fixed effects models you cannot include time-invariant regressors (they will "drop out" during the demeaning procedure). However, I was wondering if one could interact a time-invariant regressor with a time-variant regressor and include this interaction term in the regression. I found some material on the web (faculty.washington.edu/cadolph/pan/topic7.pw.pdf slide 7 out of 61) where people at least talk about this.

Like I mentioned I'd regress IEO on EEO and the interaction of EEO and Scope (while Scope is time-invariant and all other variables are time-variant).


xtreg IEO EEO c.EEO#c.Scope ....., fe vce(robust)



I would like to test if Scope moderates the relation between IEO and EEO and I am still struggling if this is a valid design.

King regards,

Roman

Am 12.01.2013 04:15, schrieb Shi, Shishan (MU-Student):
Hi Roman,
Correct me if I misunderstood your question. But it looks like your time-invariant variable 'Scope' is a known variable (I mean you know the value in the variable Scope for each record, correct?). Can you just create a new variable that is

gen newvar = StrategyB * Scope

and run OLS?

Sybil
________________________________________
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] on behalf of Roman Wörner [h0953997@wu.ac.at]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 12:44 PM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: st: RE: Fixed Effects estimation with time-invariant variables

Hi Dave,

you are totally right! What I actually ment was "independept" variable.
So one of my independent variables is time-invariant and the main
question was if I could use this variable in a fixed effects regression
if I interact it with another independent variable which changes over time.

I am very sorry for the confusion (although I read the post five times
before sending it, I didn't recognize the mistake)!

Regards,

Roman

Am 11.01.2013 19:33, schrieb Jacobs, David:
I don't understand how you can interact anything with a dependent variable.  Do you mean the lag of such a variable used as an explanatory variable?  If so, you still cannot analyze time-invariant dependent variable with either -xtreg random-effects- or -xtreg, fe- routines.  The dependent variable must change.

Unless your use of the term "dependent variable" was mistaken, I suggest you carefully read the beginning of the Xt manual and the chapter on -xtreg-.

Dave Jacobs

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Roman Wörner
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 12:01 PM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st: Fixed Effects estimation with time-invariant variables

Dear all,

I am a doctoral student and rather new to STATA and statistics in general. I am thus struggling with a question I hope some of you are familiar with.

My dataset is an unbalanced panel with N=328 and T=8. I plan to used fixed effects models to control for differences between the firms in my sample. I am aware that with fixed effects models one cannot use time-invariant dependent variables. Nevertheless, I've read that it is possible to include time-invariant dependent variables when you interact them with another (time-variant) regressor.

Basically I have three variable of interest: two time-variant variables describing different firm strategies and a time-invariant variable describing the vertical scope (% of value chain steps of the industry the firm is active in; vertical scope takes on the values 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1) of the firm. I argue that the relationship of the two strategy-variables depends on the vertical scope of the firm - for focused firms the two strategies are complements, while they are substitutes for firms with a broad scope.

I thus would run the following regression:

StrategyA = b0 + b1*StrategyB + b2*StrategyBXScope + Controls

I expect b1 to be positive and b2 to be negative. If that's the case I would interpret it that way, that an increase in the breadth of the scope reduces the complementarity between the two strategies (I would contrast combinations of StrategyA and StrategyB for different levels of Scope). I am wondering if this combination xtreg, fixed effects, time-variant and time-invariant variables are a valid design and allow for the conclusions I'd like to draw.

I am very grateful for all comments and recommendations.

Many thanks and best regards,

Roman

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index