Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Comparing two lognormal distributions |
Date | Sun, 6 Jan 2013 10:25:01 -0500 |
Syed, You may get more-useful suggestions if you provide more information about your data (including the sample sizes) and, especially, about the parameterization that you are using for the lognormal distribution. As Gordon Hughes pointed out, the usual lognormal distribution covers only nonnegative values and has two parameters (sometimes defined as the mean and variance of the corresponding normal distribution in the log scale). Often a third parameter is added to shift the origin away from zero (usually to some positive value). Your earlier posting related "shift" to skewness, but the usual shift parameter has no effect on skewness. Sometimes data come from a truncated distribution (e.g., data below a specified threshold are not reported). That threshold or truncation point may not be the same as the shift. Also, the choices in analysis depend on whether one knows the number of observations whose values were below the truncation point. Depending on those features of the data, I might consider an empirical quantile-quantile plot of the two distributions before getting into any formal inferences. David Hoaglin On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Syed Hasan <mhasan26@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks Nick. I appreciate your response.I should have been clear on my question. My intent is to compare truncation of one distribution compared to the other. Sorry about that. > > Regards, > > Syed * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/