Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: nonlinear regression using GMM |

Date |
Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:43:16 -0500 |

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311) <alan.h.feiveson@nasa.gov> wrote: > Usman -I assume what you have written is the right-hand side of E(Y|DP, lr1, etc.) where Y is your dependent variable. If so, this looks linear to me if you re-parameterize as follows: > > > E(Y'|lr1, DP, etc.) = A0*w1*DP + A1*DP*lr1 + A2*DP*w2 + A3*DP*w3 + A4*DP*y1 + A5*DP*y2 + A6*DP*y3 > > where Y' = Y - lr1 and where A0 = {a0}*{a1}, A1 = {a0}, A2 = {a0}*{a2}, etc. > > > Thus, you have a an equation that is linear in 7 parameters (A0, A1, .., A6) I suppose it would depend on the error process that is assumed. So if you have a fully multiplicative model the notion is that the errors are multiplicative too. If that's not what's assumed the expected value structure may be linearizable, but the error term may not. So E(y|x) = exp(x' b) + u is not linearizable while E(y|x) = exp(x' b + u) is. Thus I think the original poster needs to decide what the model is, not just the mean structure. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: RE: nonlinear regression using GMM***From:*"Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)" <alan.h.feiveson@nasa.gov>

**References**:**st: nonlinear regression using GMM***From:*Usman Gilani <u.gilani@icloud.com>

**st: RE: nonlinear regression using GMM***From:*"Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)" <alan.h.feiveson@nasa.gov>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: creating a panel id variable from strings and decimals** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: RE: nonlinear regression using GMM** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: nonlinear regression using GMM** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: RE: nonlinear regression using GMM** - Index(es):