Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: R: ANOVA repeated measures |
Date | Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:16:12 -0500 |
Yes there's a clear risk of non-normality in meausres such as this. If the measure has a multiplicative structure (as bacterial growth might) then logging first would help. On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Carlo Lazzaro <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it> wrote: > Rune might also consider to regress the difference in bal_1 and bal_2 > (diff_bal) on intervention dummy (Int). > > - reg diff_bal Int - > > Otherwise, should Rune follow paired ttest approach (as previously suggested > by Jay) some concerns about the normality of bal measuremets might arise. In > this instance, Rune can opt for a bootstrap paired ttest. > > Best Regards, > Carlo > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di Rune Nielsen > Inviato: martedì 6 novembre 2012 14:56 > A: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Oggetto: st: ANOVA repeated measures > > Dear statalist members, > > We have done a simple pilot study where we measure the number of bacteria on > the tip of a bronchoscope two times on the same 20 subjects. Half of these > subjects have received an intervention to reduce the number of bacteria. So > in a long dataset with 40 observations I have the following variables > Idnr - subject ID > meas - binary variable indicating first (=1) or second (=2) measurement > flush - binary variable whether the subject have received (=1) or not (=0) > the intervention > bal - measurement of bacterial load > > What I would like to do, is to test whether the difference between > measurement 1 and measurement 2 is depending on whether they have received > the intervention. I've tried various ANOVA syntaxes, but my limited > knowledge won't quite get me there. > > Probably this reveals my incompetence, but nevertheless I hope for an answer > that is understandable for a non-statisician. > > Best wishes, > > Rune Nielsen > > --- > Rune Nielsen, MD, PhD, postdoctoral fellow > Institute of Medicine > Department of Thoracic Medicine > Haukeland University Hospital > N-5021 Bergen > Norway > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ -- JVVerkuilen, PhD jvverkuilen@gmail.com "Thus the typical citizen drops down to a lower level of mental performance as soon as he enters the political field. He argues and analyzes in a way which he would readily recognize as infantile within the sphere of his real interests. He becomes a primitive again. His thinking becomes associative and affective." ---Joseph A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 1950, p. 262. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/