Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Start values for MLE with xtmixed

From   Arne Risa Hole <>
Subject   Re: st: Start values for MLE with xtmixed
Date   Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:41:13 +0100

This won't help the original poster but you can supply your own
starting values and impose constraints with -mixlogit- (available from
SSC) as this uses -ml- to maximise the simulated likelihood function.
See Figure 1 in!/file/2011011.pdf for an
example of how this feature can be used to study empirical
identification as mentioned by Jay.


On 24 October 2012 13:48, JVerkuilen (Gmail) <> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Maarten Buis <> wrote:
>> In the case of starting
>> values, you go to the link called maximize_options, and than you look
>> for an option called -from()-. No such option is listed, so you cannot
>> provide starting values.
> I looked for that too and came to the same conclusion. -xtmixed- is
> using the EM algorithm to generate starting values. For the vast
> majority of situations it's what you'd want and is thus the
> appropriate option.
> However, there are a number of circumstances---examples include random
> effects meta-analysis with a relatively complex design, profiling a
> random effect's parameter(s), or studying empirical
> identification---where it would be highly useful to be able to assign
> parameters specific starting values and/or fix them in place with no
> iteration. To my knowledge (and based on prior statements by Vince
> Wiggins here:,
> -xtmixed-, -xtmelogit-, and -xtmepoisson- can't do that at present. I
> think you could probably do that with -gllamm-.
> Jay
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> *
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index