Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Multivariate kernel regression

From   Austin Nichols <>
Subject   Re: st: Multivariate kernel regression
Date   Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:03:48 -0400

Josh Hyman <>:
Just looked at
briefly, but it does not seem to have been written by someone well
versed in Stata programming.

More substantively:
It seems to compute the univariate ROT bandwidth for kernel density
estimates (see p.892 of the Stata manual entry on -kdensity- for the
same formula), not conditional mean (polynomial order zero) estimates
(see p.1009 of the Stata manual entry on -lpoly- for the very
different formula), in each dimension completely separately, which
seems like a terrible idea.  You would be better off computing
Mahalanobis distance and using a conic kernel, then doing some kind of
cross validation to get a good bandwidth.  Plus, that kernreg.ado just
computes zero-order polynomial regressions, so you are much better off
writing your own program that estimates a linear surface (hyperplane)
at each point.

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Josh Hyman <> wrote:
> Thank you so much Austin and Shan.
> Shan - I very much appreciate your pointing out the .ado files on
> Manski's webpage, in particular kernreg.ado and gridgen.ado . These
> will be a great place for me to start, and seem very to be very
> similar to what Austin recommended I try starting with. Ideally I
> would like to use slightly more than 4 covariates, but this is
> terrific for now, and I will see if I can augment the code to accept a
> few more.
> Austin - Thanks a lot for your suggestions. I met with John DiNardo
> recently about this project, but haven't asked him about the
> multivariate kernel regression. I sent him an email yesterday to see
> if he will discuss this with me. I will begin by coding up your
> suggestion to help me understand. Your explanation was very helpful
> for me in understanding how the multivariate kernel regression is
> operating.
> Thanks again to you both! This was my first time posting a question to
> the Stata listserve, and I found it incredibly helpful.
> Thanks,
>   Josh
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Austin Nichols <> wrote:
>> Josh Hyman <>:
>> Taking the mean of Y for values of X near X0 *is* a regression; you
>> are calculating the conditional mean of Y. What you describe is a
>> zero-degree local polynomial regression in -lpoly- (a regression on
>> just a constant), which is inadvisable (though -lpoly- default
>> behavior) for the reasons given in the -lpoly- manual entry. Better to
>> regress on X and interactions (all in deviation form from point X0)
>> and predict at X=X0.  I recommend you start with a simple example with
>> say 100 values of a one-dimensional X and try calculating the means of
>> Y at (say) 10 values using a couple different approaches, to get a
>> sense of what you are doing.  Then generalize to 100*100 values of X1
>> and X2 and calculate mean Y at (say) 100 points on that grid.
>> Did you look at
>> (multivariate kernel density estimation)?
>> Ask John DiNardo if you have conceptual questions--if he is currently
>> accessible to you at the Ford school--the big ideas may easier to
>> explain in person.
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Josh Hyman <> wrote:
>> > Hi Austin (and others),
>> >
>> > Thank you very much for your reply. Sorry about my delayed response -
>> > I wanted to investigate more to make sure I understood your
>> > suggestion.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure your suggestion gets me exactly what I was looking for,
>> > and I want to clarify. My reference to -lpoly- in my initial post may
>> > have been confusing. I don't actually want to do kernel-weighted local
>> > regressions. I want to estimate "multivariate kernel regression",
>> > which to my understanding, doesn't actually involve any regressions at
>> > all. It takes the weighted average of Y for all observations near to
>> > the particular value of X, weighted using the kernel function. And
>> > where X represents more than 2 variables. So, this actually seems the
>> > same to me as multivariate kernel density estimation, which I also
>> > don't see any user-written commands for in Stata. What I am looking
>> > for, I guess is like a version of -kdens2- that allows for more than
>> > one "xvar", and wouldn't output a graph (since it would be in greater
>> > than 3 dimensions), but rather would output the fitted or predicted
>> > values of the Y (like -predict, xb-) for each observation.
>> >
>> > Regardless, it sounds like given your suggestion, one way to do this
>> > is to loop over all possible combinations of the values of the X
>> > variables and calculate the weighted Y for each combination using the
>> > kernel of my choice? Please let me know if this would be your
>> > suggestion, or if given my further clarification, if you know of any
>> > user-written commands in Stata to do this, or if you have any other
>> > suggestions.
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot for your help, and sorry again for the delayed response.
>> > Josh
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Austin Nichols <> wrote:
>> >> Josh Hyman <>:
>> >> If you know the multivariate kernel you want to use, and the grid you
>> >> want to smooth over, it is straightforward to loop over the grid and
>> >> compute the regressions.  To program a general estimator for a wide
>> >> class of kernels would be substantially more work.  See e.g. -kdens-
>> >> on SSC and
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> A simple conic (triangle) kernel in 2 dimensions is easiest, see e.g.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Josh Hyman <> wrote:
>> >>> Dear Statalist users,
>> >>>
>> >>> I am trying to figure out if there is a way in Stata to perform
>> >>> multivariate kernel regression. I have investigated online and on the
>> >>> Statalist, but with no success. What I am looking for would be similar
>> >>> conceptually to the -lpoly- command, but with the ability to enter more
>> >>> than one "xvar".
>> >>>
>> >>> If there are no Stata commands to do this (user-written or otherwise), then
>> >>> do you recommend coding up a program to do this manually? I have used Stata
>> >>> for many years, and written programs before, but have never had to code up
>> >>> a regression manually. If you have suggestions on how to do this, or
>> >>> resources to consult, that would be greatly appreciated.
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index