Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Normally distributed error term & testing normality of residuals |
Date | Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:53:46 +0100 |
No one said that. You can plot the residuals, or their squares, or their absolute values, or roots of absolute values -- there are arguments for each -- against anything of interest, e.g. a predictor or fitted values. See e.g. SJ-4-4 gr0009 . . . . . . . . . . Speaking Stata: Graphing model diagnostics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox (help anovaplot, indexplot, modeldiag, ofrtplot, ovfplot, qfrplot, racplot, rdplot, regplot, rhetplot, rvfplot2, rvlrplot, rvpplot2 if installed) Q4/04 SJ 4(4):449--475 plotting diagnostic information calculated from residuals and fitted values from regression models with continuous responses for one broad discussion. That paper says nothing specific about -tobit- models, however. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Ebru Ozturk <ebru_0512@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thank you. So, there is no possibility to check heteroscedasticity graphically? > > Ebru > > ---------------------------------------- >> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:25:14 -0400 >> Subject: Re: st: Normally distributed error term & testing normality of residuals >> From: jvverkuilen@gmail.com >> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Ebru Ozturk <ebru_0512@hotmail.com> wrote: >> > With default do you mean without robust standard error or something else? >> > >> Yes, the default is OIM. >> >> >> > ---------------------------------------- >> >> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:57:59 -0400 >> >> Subject: Re: st: Normally distributed error term & testing normality of residuals >> >> From: jvverkuilen@gmail.com >> >> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Ebru Ozturk <ebru_0512@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Thank you very much. One last question altough it is slightly different from the main issue: >> >> > >> >> > In order to test heteroscedasticity assumption can I use scatter plots etc? or do I need to use a formal test like for testing normality issue? >> >> >> >> I think I'd probably use both, as the test just says "there appears to >> >> be heteroscedasticity" but doesn't tell you much about what it might >> >> be. One other quick and cheap diagnoser of heteroscedasticity is to >> >> run with robust standard errors and with default. If they appear to >> >> differ much, that's a sign you have a problem. >> >> * * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/