Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Re: Why is Mata much slower than MATLAB at matrix inversion?
From
"Joseph Coveney" <[email protected]>
To
"'Joseph Coveney'" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject
st: Re: Why is Mata much slower than MATLAB at matrix inversion?
Date
Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:58:10 +0900
I wrote:
Is -cholinv()- the Mata equivalent of MATLAB's inv()?
Mata's -invsym()- is more than 100 times faster than its -cholinv()- on my
ancient laptop.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I see now from MATLAB's online documentation that inv() doesn't require the
matrix to be symmetric, something that I should have inferred from Patrick's
example code snippet. Apologies for the too-quick reply.
Joseph Coveney
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/