Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: Graph higher than individual survey data


From   "David Radwin" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: Graph higher than individual survey data
Date   Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:29:05 -0700 (PDT)

Ann,

Can you multiply the binary variables by 100 to make them percentages and
then use -eclplot- (Roger Newson, SSC) to show the mean values and 95%
CIs?

David
--
David Radwin
Senior Research Associate
MPR Associates, Inc.
2150 Shattuck Ave., Suite 800
Berkeley, CA 94704
Phone: 510-849-4942
Fax: 510-849-0794

www.mprinc.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of ann montgomery
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 6:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: Graph higher than individual survey data
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have individual level data, and I want to graph proportionate
> estimates at a regional level.
> 
> I have four regions (region==1/4),
> and four binary variables (var1, var2, var3, var3==0/1) describing
> four types of health service used by each individual in the dataset,
> and pweights.
> 
> I want to plot proportion of each health service used by individuals
> in the region (prop of individuals from that region who are "yes",
> with 95%CI bars), preferable on a single graph.
> 
> I've played with collapse but can't figure out how to tell Stata to
> attach the upper and lower 95% CI to the new regional proportion.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Ann Montgomery
> Graduate student, Epidemiology
> University of Toronto

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index