Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | "Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu> |
| To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
| Subject | st: RE: Thread-index: AQHNYzVuthYG3q8N8Ee+qo7+M5pSrg== |
| Date | Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:37:06 -0700 |
THis is an uninformative title. CAn you give a better one? See FAQ ________________________________________ From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Brendan Churchill [Brendan.Churchill@utas.edu.au] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 2:28 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: Thread-index: AQHNYzVuthYG3q8N8Ee+qo7+M5pSrg== Hi All What is the best way to graph results from a multilevel model in Stata? I’ve tried the *predict* command but because I am using binaries and centred variables when I try to produce a graph – it looks a total mess. I have tried graphing by generating a variable made up of the coefficients, which yields better results (or rather better looking results) but when I add in binary variable coefficients or categorical coefficients again I have similar issues. Any advice? Or do you need more information? Greatly appreciated! Brendan * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/