Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: SUR
From
"Happy Stata" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: SUR
Date
Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:25:28 +0300
Thank you sir.
Have a good weekend.
Mesut
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Antonakis
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2012 5:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: SUR
Hi Mesut:
Take a look at the Stata command -sem-. You can estimate SUR models
(see Ex. 12) with missing data using the -method(mlmv)- option.
HTH,
John.
__________________________________________
Prof. John Antonakis
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________
On 14.07.2012 16:02, Mesut Karakas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are using sur (seemingly unrelated regression), but our equations
> do not have the same number of observations due to missing variables.
> To cope with this issue, there exists a solution:
> http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0079
> But this solution takes too much time.
> Is there anyone who can help with this problem in a basic way (i.e. a
> command in stata or add-in etc).
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Mesut Karakas
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/