Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: SUR
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: SUR
Date
Sat, 14 Jul 2012 09:28:13 -0400
Please take note of the FAQ section:
• "It is long-standing practice on Statalist that most members, especially the most active members who supply a large fraction of the answers, post using their real names. This is one of the ways in which we show respect to others. So we discourage you from posting from behind fake names or identifiers. Such handles are particularly objectionable if they include the word “Stata” in some way.. "
I would add that "real names" include first and last names.
Steve
[email protected]
On Jul 14, 2012, at 4:47 AM, Happy Stata wrote:
Hello,
we are using sur (seemingly unrelated regression), but our equations
do not have the same number of observations due to missing variables.
To cope with this issue, there exists a solution:
http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0079
But this solution takes too much time.
Is there anyone who can help with this problem in a basic way (i.e. a
command in stata or add-in etc).
Thanks in advance.
Happy (Mesut)
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/