Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: xtivreg2, robust error

From   "Schaffer, Mark E" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: xtivreg2, robust error
Date   Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:56:03 +0100


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ari Dothan
> Sent: 02 July 2012 11:47
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: xtivreg2, robust error
> Hi all,
> I use xtivreg2 regressions specifying "fe gmm2s bw(3)".

This means "robust to autocorrelation but NOT heteroskedasticity",

"fe gmm2s bw(3) robust"

means "robust to autocorrelation AND heteroskedasticity".

> In some cases I get more efficient results (smaller standard 
> error) when specifying "fe gmm2s bw(3) robust" than without 
> the "robust"
> requirement.
> How could this be explained?

You can't safely interpret the differences in this way.  The theoretical
results for efficiency of the 2-step GMM estimator are asymptotic, i.e.,
as the sample size goes to infinity.  What happens in the real world,
with finite samples, can be different.


> Thanking you
> --
> Ari Dothan
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> *

Heriot-Watt University is the Sunday Times
Scottish University of the Year 2011-2012

Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
registered under charity number SC000278.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index