Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: xtlogit with fe for rare events


From   Austin Nichols <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: xtlogit with fe for rare events
Date   Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:19:42 -0400

Marc Peters <[email protected]>:
That is appropriate--if you think there is unobserved heterogeneity
that calls for -xtlogit, fe- or -clogit- then you need to drop the
cases with no variation in outcomes. You have a small sample (of cases
with variation in outcomes)--better to accept that fact. You can
cluster SE in a pooled -logit- as well, but you will get biased point
estimates from -logit- in the case that the assumptions for -xtlogit,
fe- are met.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Marc Peters <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am running logistic regressions with CSTS data using Statas xtlogit
> with fixed effects. My dependent variable is quite rare and 2/3 of all
> the groups do not have any positive outcomes during the 20 years I
> have in my dataset. As a consequence all these groups are excluded and
> I end up with a relatively small sample. I wonder if you have any
> suggestions on how to improve the model? Are there any way to
> circumvent this problem, but still cluster the standard errors?
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index