Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu, statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: weighted logistic regression in stata |
Date | Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:01:22 -0500 |
At 08:12 AM 6/20/2012, Steve Samuels wrote:
You are describing what used to be called the "errors in variables" problem; nowit is known as the "measurement error" problem. The kind of weighting you describe does not solve this problem, as far as I know. (I'd be happy to learn otherwise.) It is ordinarily used to accommodate outcomes, not covariates, that are measured with unequal precision. In thisapplication, the weights are known as "analytic" weights (in Stata, "aweights"; see the -help- for "weights")
Incidentally, aweights are not allowed with Stata's logistic regression commands (except under version control). See these two messages for a brief discussion:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-07/msg01156.html http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-07/msg01160.html ------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/