Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | William Buchanan <william@williambuchanan.net> |
To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | Re: st: Labelling of categorical variables in regression outputs |
Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:33:13 -0700 |
Hi Amal, There are options with -esttab- and -estout- (both available from ssc) that allow you to relabel the coefficients. - Billy Sent from my iPhone On Jun 18, 2012, at 7:14, Amal Khanolkar <Amal.Khanolkar@ki.se> wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been runnning regression models (linear & logistic) and my main exposure variable has 20 categories, including the reference. Having so many categories it often takes time to read the output as I forget what the categories are. In regression models, Stata names the categories as numbers '2, 3, 4, 5, 6 etc....'. > > Is there any way by which I can tell Stata to instead the use the original labels for the categories? > > The maine xpsore variable is country of birth as follows: > > mother's country of | > birth | Freq. Percent Cum. > --------------------+----------------------------------- > Sweden | 2,593,143 86.69 86.69 > Western Europe + NA | 71,736 2.40 89.09 > Finland | 108,326 3.62 92.71 > Eastern Europe | 15,636 0.52 93.23 > Poland | 18,179 0.61 93.84 > F. Yugoslavia | 34,110 1.14 94.98 > Arab league | 8,687 0.29 95.27 > Iraq | 13,004 0.43 95.71 > Lebanon | 12,295 0.41 96.12 > Somalia | 7,122 0.24 96.36 > Syria | 9,360 0.31 96.67 > Turkey | 22,083 0.74 97.41 > Iran | 11,717 0.39 97.80 > South Asia | 9,341 0.31 98.11 > Ethiopia+Eritrea | 6,917 0.23 98.34 > East asia | 23,162 0.77 99.12 > Latin America | 10,111 0.34 99.46 > Chile | 10,512 0.35 99.81 > Africa | 5,759 0.19 100.00 > > > - I've tried using the esttab & esttout commands but I haven't been able to solve the problem. I still get models where the above categories are labelled as numbers. > > - so far I've used: > > esttab, ci wide. > > I wasn't able to find a function for the labelling. > > - Could the porblem lie in how I have created the above labelling? > > Thanks & regards, > /Amal. > > > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/