Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Branch-and-Bound algorithm


From   Beatrice Crozza <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Branch-and-Bound algorithm
Date   Tue, 29 May 2012 16:22:04 +0100

I am trying to estimate an unrestricted model to compare it with mine
with a likelihood ratio test, however, the likelihood is much more
complicate (since the number of the parameters increase) and the
standard error for one of the parameters is missing.

Bea


2012/5/29 Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Beatrice Crozza
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> is there a way to implement in Stata a Branch-and-Bound algorithm for
>> the maxim likelihood?
>
> Tell us more. This must be a pretty weird likelihood if you have to
> rely on branch-and-bound to maximize it.
>
>
> --
> ---- Stas Kolenikov
> -- http://stas.kolenikov.name
> ---- Senior Survey Statistician, Abt SRBI
> -- Opinions stated in this email are mine only, and do not reflect the
> position of my employer
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index