Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: oaxaca twofold decomposition


From   Fernando Rios Avila <f.rios.a@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: oaxaca twofold decomposition
Date   Fri, 25 May 2012 11:13:41 -0400

Two suggestions:
try either -ssc install oaxaca, replace-
Or go manually to the address of the do files which could be either
here "C:\ado\plus\o" or here "C:\Program Files\Stata12\ado\base\o" and
manually erase the oaxaca files, before trying to install them again.
Fernando

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com> wrote:
> THanks,
> the problem is that Stata does not allow me to reinstall the Oaxaca. By tipying:
>
> ssc install oaxaca
> checking oaxaca consistency and verifying not already installed...
>
> the following files already exist and are different:
>    c:\ado\plus\o\oaxaca.ado
>    c:\ado\plus\o\oaxaca.hlp
>
> no files installed or copied
> (no action taken)
> r(602);
>
> the errore message says that Stata cannot overwrite the existing file!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 25/05/2012, Fernando Rios Avila <f.rios.a@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Chiara
>> I think you should reinstall the new version of the oaxaca command
>> -ssc install oaxaca -
>> For instance, with my own data, i could make the decomposition respect
>> to union and non union workers using the following command:
>> xi:oaxaca lnwageh $var1[aw=factor], swap weight(`um') by(union)
>> nodetail relax cluster(upm)
>> where `um' is the weight for the counter factual.
>> you might find more details on the help file of the "new" -oaxaca- command.
>> Fernando
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>> I estimated an Oaxaca model by using the twofold (explained vs
>>> unemplained decomposition) with Stata 11.2. Command:
>>>
>>> qui regress lwage $x if fem==0
>>> estimates store male
>>> qui regress lwage $x if fem==1
>>> estimates store female
>>> oaxaca male female, wei(1)
>>>
>>> where fem==0 is my reference group.
>>> I tried doing the same with Stata ver 12.1, but I did get an error
>>> message:
>>> "variable male not found". The sintax is probably changed with this
>>> new version. I looked at the help but I dod not find a similar command
>>> to get my twofold Oaxaca.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions,
>>> Thanks
>>> Chiara
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chiara Mussida
>>> PhD candidate
>>> Doctoral school of Economic Policy
>>> Catholic University, Piacenza (Italy)
>>> *
>>> *   For searches and help try:
>>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>> *
>> *   For searches and help try:
>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>
>
> --
> Chiara Mussida
> PhD candidate
> Doctoral school of Economic Policy
> Catholic University, Piacenza (Italy)
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index