Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Extracting substrings from variables.


From   Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Extracting substrings from variables.
Date   Fri, 25 May 2012 13:22:32 +0100

I agree with that.

I had a lot of fun working with a question posed by Tony Lachenbruch:
how to handle Roman numerals in Stata.
You could get so far with a quick and dirty approach, but doing it
properly meant grasping the nettle, biting the bullet and taking the
medicine, otherwise known as regex. The story is at

http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=dm0054

See also -moss- (SSC, Robert Picard and myself) for one convenient
wrapper for some regex problems.

Nick

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Brendan Halpin <brendan.halpin@ul.ie> wrote:
> On Fri, May 25 2012, Nick Cox wrote:
>
>> It's a motto of mine always to try something simpler before I try
>> regex machinery. (Nothing against regex, just a preference to use
>> something simpler when that suffices; and I've seen so many struggling
>> with regex that this preference is supported. It's also true that you
>> won't learn regex without trying it.)
>
> The late Eric Naggum used to say "if you think a regexp is the solution
> to your problem, you have two problems", but under certain circumstances
> regexps are expressive, and readable once you know the syntax. They're
> also portable to other contexts.
>
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index