Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: No. of observations
From
Kieran McCaul <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: No. of observations
Date
Tue, 22 May 2012 10:31:27 +0800
...
A sub-sample of a sample will, by definition, be smaller than the sample, won't it?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hamizah Hassan
Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2012 9:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: No. of observations
Greetings,
I have an issue that has been questioned where the no. of observations of my full sample and sub-sample (of a variable) are not the same, i.e. the total observations of my sub-sample is lesser than the full sample. How could I explain this?
Thank you.
Regards,
Hamizah Hassan
RMIT University
Melbourne
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/